<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC Pays Google for Search Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrdaz.com/bbc-pays-google-for-search-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrdaz.com/bbc-pays-google-for-search-rankings/</link>
	<description>So much anger, so little time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Girdwood</title>
		<link>http://www.mrdaz.com/bbc-pays-google-for-search-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-12317</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrdaz.com/?p=1372#comment-12317</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a really juicy story, with a lot of Twitter coverage and plenty of traffic. Those are all certainly some of the reasons why the story is still live on the bigmouthmedia website - but we&#039;ve put an update on the bottom of the story to make it clear that the origin/Mail of Sunday lumped everything into a single &quot;search&quot; category. We&#039;ve also provided some other links to other variations of the story. 

It&#039;s been interesting from a SEO/social/brand point of view - from the minute the story went live there&#039;s been arguments to either pull it, promote it, sit on it or just wait and see. The challenge is to try and get the best of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a really juicy story, with a lot of Twitter coverage and plenty of traffic. Those are all certainly some of the reasons why the story is still live on the bigmouthmedia website &#8211; but we&#8217;ve put an update on the bottom of the story to make it clear that the origin/Mail of Sunday lumped everything into a single &#8220;search&#8221; category. We&#8217;ve also provided some other links to other variations of the story. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been interesting from a SEO/social/brand point of view &#8211; from the minute the story went live there&#8217;s been arguments to either pull it, promote it, sit on it or just wait and see. The challenge is to try and get the best of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

